Right Not To Vote

If we have a ‘none of the above’ button in the Electronic Voting Machines, we can reject all candidates and threaten the politicians to distribute tickets on the basis of competency.

To meet this demand, People’s Union for Civil Liberties had filed Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in 2004. In 2009, a Supreme Court bench referred the matter to a higher bench. It has been 2 years and no decision yet.

I have filed a RTI in the Supreme Court asking for the reason behind the delay in decision. If you believe in the reform, please add to the pressure by filing the RTI. It will take an hour and Rs.10 to do the same but its results may be tremendous.

To check the details on Supreme Court website, click

http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/chejudis.asp

Case no 161
Writ Petition (Civil)
Year: 2004

Comments

  1. Everytime i read your content, its was always an informational and motivating, it was really good to know these facts, and i will help you to make people aware about the same, thanks and keep it up.....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Now we can use 49-O for not to vote which will identify the person. That is wrong. It is not enough to add a Button not to vote. If not to vote increases above the margin of Victory re-election must be done by the election commission.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Appreciate your effort of educating people !!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

People's queries for People in Power

What is Ecoplore?

How I fell in love with 6 kids?